Helping Secondary students to engage with Shakespeare’s work

Dr Anjna Chouhan

Dr Anjna Chouhan is lecturer in Shakespeare Studies at the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, where she teaches pupils across Secondary school ages (home and international), university students, and Shakespeare enthusiasts. Anjna’s research is on Shakespeare in the nineteenth century, and her work includes: Henry Irving (Pickering and Chatto, 2012), The Shakespeare Book (Dorling Kindersley, 2015), and articles in Victorian Network and Nineteenth Century Theatre and Film. Anjna is a contributor to the Cambridge Schools Shakespeare digital resource and has written resources for Digital Theatre Plus, as well as acting as educator in MOOCs for the British Council and the RSC. Anjna is also a Shakespeare consultant for BBC Learning projects.

Follow @SBTeducation

Follow @shakespearebt

Website: Email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Originally published on 26th April 2016 Originally published on 26th April 2016

Teaching Shakespeare can be at once exhilarating and terrifying; inspirational and life-threateningly tedious. I like to think that the contradictions here echo, or at least nod, to the emotional rollercoaster that was early modern drama. When speaking to students – Secondary school and university – a common stumbling block is invariably language. Besides the archaic vocabulary – ‘hautboy’, ‘nonce’, ‘tun-dish’ and ‘fardel’ come to mind – there’s also the syntax, the distinctly Christian rhetoric, and seemingly endless concerns about marriage and death. For pupils in Secondary school these subject matters, compounded by unintuitive phrasing and words, can be a categorical turn-off.

"Simply telling pupils that Shakespeare wrote for the stage is not enough."

When you’re 14, it’s unlikely, though not impossible, that you care about unrequited love or that a man accuses his fiancée of infidelity at the altar. Much less in a story written over 400 years ago in English that seems counter-intuitive.

The key, then, is to remove or to re-appropriate these obstacles: language and subject matter. First and foremost, the language needs to be placed into context. Simply telling pupils that Shakespeare wrote for the stage is not enough. What does that mean? How does writing for the stage differ from writing for the page, and for a reader? What was the early modern theatrical world actually like? Who was Shakespeare writing for: which actors, audiences, patrons? These questions actively engage pupils in re-considering text as something living, something organic.

Understanding the language of theatre is fundamental in breaking down those unhelpful myths around Shakespeare’s poetic and terribly ‘important’ language of literature. The difference between describing a night sky to an audience in a public open-air theatre and showing one in a film is entirely linguistic. Whether we’re explaining Hamlet’s ‘antic disposition’, Claudio’s jealousy, Coriolanus’ pride or Titus’ wrath, we’re talking about devised, calculatedly hyperbolic theatricality. All of it comes from the language.

As for subject matter, like language, context is the key. I find that myth-busting is a good place to start to overcome those lazy generalisations: all women were inferior, everyone got married young, nobody could read or write. Paint the Elizabethan and Jacobean Englands as rich, colourful, diverse and even scandalous places, and suddenly the street fight between the Montagues and Capulets becomes more intense, and Juliet’s marriage is actually far more troubling than romantic.

How about trying out a new type of play? Swap late-night, under-aged window serenades for vengeance and pies. Or fairies in a wood for shepherds"There are stories and characters in every play that pupils can engage with." in a forest. There are stories and characters in every play that pupils can engage with and even come to care for, if they wish. Encourage pupils to retell Shakespeare’s story in a world more familiar to themselves. How do those stories differ? Where are the cross-overs? How have film, theatre, opera and dance directors dealt with these stories? What do their versions tell you, or add to / change, about your understanding of the play? Encouraging pupils to engage with the subject matter both within and outside of its context is a fundamental step in teaching and exploring Shakespeare’s work.

The four would-be academics in Love’s Labour’s Lost agree that knowledge and understanding come from experience: “where we are our learning likewise is”. No matter what these characters do, they believe that they are learning something - however grand or trivial. This is because they are learning in a personal way: transcending the unintuitive, archaic and generally ‘old’, to recognise that context changes everything. Perhaps making Shakespeare’s language and subject matter a personal experience can, in turn, help to make ‘learning’ about his work part of a pupil’s actual world and more ‘where I am’ as opposed to ‘where I’m expected to be’. Making a pupil feel worthy or empowered to read, watch, talk about and even enjoy Shakespeare’s plays must surely be the ultimate goal of any teacher.  

Do you use these tactics? Share your experiences below.

Read More

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the best of Innovate My School, straight to your inbox.

What are you interested in?

By signing up you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

1,300+ guest writers.
ideas & stories. 
Share yours.

In order to make our website better for you, we use cookies!

Some firefox users may experience missing content, to fix this, click the shield in the top left and "disable tracking protection"